The Methodology of Usuli Reasoning according to Qadi 'Abd al-Wahhab al-Maliki in his book "Al-Ma'unah": An Analytical Presentation.

Abstract

This research aims to elucidate the features of the jurisprudential methodology adopted by Qadi 'Abd al-Wahhab al-Baghdadi al-Maliki in reasoning and deriving practical rulings within his book "Al-Ma'unah". The study traces the judge's methods of reasoning, illustrating his application of agreed-upon evidence such as the Qur'an, Sunnah, Consensus, and Analogy, as well as secondary and disputed evidence that characterizes the Maliki school. The latter includes the Practice of the People of Medina, Unrestricted Public Interest, Blocking the Means, Presumption of Continuity, and Custom. The significance of this study lies in highlighting the applied, practical aspect of the Iraqi Maliki school by bridging universal principles with specific branches. The study concludes that Qadi 'Abd al-Wahhab successfully achieved a precise integration between Usuli theory and Fiqhi application. He demonstrated flexibility in specifying and restricting general texts through derived meanings, while maintaining strict adherence to Ijma', consistent reliance on Qiyas, and careful consideration of outcomes and public interests in directing legal rulings.